Marjorie Taylor Greene snatched Trump’s Social Security pledge and threw it on the floor — here’s why she’s so mad

[ad_1] Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, who chairs the Home subcommittee created to help the brand new Division of Authorities Effectivity (DOGE), was lately confronted over President-elect Donald Trump’s marketing campaign pledge to not reduce Social Safety.

Her response was to throw a printed copy of the pledge on the bottom and say, “You guys suck,” referring, presumably, to the Democratic Social gathering and its supporters.

Do not miss Right here’s what occurred.

A confrontation over Social Safety When Greene was heading for the primary subcommittee assembly, she was confronted by Alex Lawson, the manager director of Strengthen Social Safety, a gaggle devoted to increasing and strengthening the advantages program. Lawson held up a mailed doc containing Trump's pledge to not reduce Social Safety, asking if Greene would promise to honor it.

Greene turned offended upon seeing Lawson, and she or he threw the doc on the ground, though it's unclear if she realized it was a marketing campaign mailer from Trump on the time of the incident.

Greene did not wait to listen to what Lawson needed to say earlier than she reacted. In response to experiences of the incident, as quickly as Lawson referred to as out "congresswoman" to get her consideration, Greene instantly acknowledged him and commenced yelling that he was a part of a "Democrat PAC," that he's "funded by a Democratic PAC, donates 100% to Democrats, and is ‘not media.’"

When replying to Lawson's request, Greene additionally stated, "I need not take a pledge as a result of we have already achieved that every one yr lengthy, and guess what? The unhappy story for you is the American folks elected Trump, his agenda and Republicans to steer the nation since you guys suck so unhealthy."

Whereas her phrases indicate that the Republicans haven't proposed cuts and should not plan to, Newsweek reported that one other Home Republican, Greg Lopez of Colorado, responded to a query about Social Safety and Medicare by stating that "there will probably be some cuts."

Learn extra: Are you wealthy sufficient to affix the highest 1%? This is the web value you might want to rank amongst America’s wealthiest — plus 2 methods to construct that first-class portfolio

Is Social Safety protected? Republicans like Greene and Lopez are dealing with robust questions on Social Safety for some essential causes.

For one factor, Social Safety is the biggest line merchandise within the authorities's finances, accounting for near a fifth of all federal spending, in response to the Peter G. Peterson Basis.

With DOGE aiming to chop $2 trillion from the federal finances, getting anyplace close to that quantity will probably be troublesome with out making adjustments to Medicare or Social Safety or each.

What's extra, Social Safety's belief fund is predicted to run dry as early as 2035, necessitating an automated 23% advantages reduce if adjustments will not be made.

President Trump additionally pledged through the marketing campaign to finish taxes on Social Safety advantages, which may consequence within the belief fund working quick three years sooner and necessitating a bigger 33% advantages reduce, in response to the Committee for a Accountable Federal Finances.

These points make it troublesome for the established order to proceed. This doesn't, nevertheless, imply that Republicans will embrace cuts, as decreasing advantages is extraordinarily unpopular.

The fact is that Social Safety is usually referred to as the third rail in politics. With Trump planning an bold populist agenda, there are many less-popular targets for him to focus his spending cuts on which can be prone to be a a lot increased precedence.

What to learn subsequent This text supplies data solely and shouldn't be construed as recommendation. It's supplied with out guarantee of any variety.