Can a county fire a sheriff behind closed doors? Advocacy group threatens to sue for access

[ad_1] An open authorities advocacy group is threatening to sue a California county that's making ready to debate firing its elected sheriff behind closed doorways.

San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus, who serves one of many wealthiest communities within the nation, has confronted requires her elimination since an explosive November report from a retired choose discovered that she doubtless violated the county’s coverage on nepotism and conflicting relationships.

The report alleged that, by 2024, Corpus had “relinquished management” of the division to a subordinate. That led to a poll measure final 12 months that voters handed to empower the county Board of Supervisors to take away her from workplace, which they voted to do in June. Corpus appealed, resulting in the scheduled August evidentiary listening to.

As a part of the elimination proceedings, Corpus’ authorized crew requested that the elimination listening to happen behind closed doorways.

“The county ought to decline,” wrote First Modification Coalition legal professional Aaron Area in a letter to the county Board of Supervisors. “Barring the press and public from the elimination listening to as Sheriff Corpus has requested would violate the First Modification proper of entry to public proceedings, undermine a panoply of compelling public pursuits in administering the elimination listening to transparently and needlessly shut San Mateo residents out of a key section of a course of.”

The listening to is scheduled to start Aug. 18 and is anticipated to final about 10 days.

CalMatters initially filed a request to open the June elimination listening to to the general public, a request that was denied. The First Modification Coalition is making the identical request for the August elimination listening to.

Corpus’ elimination — and her combat towards it, together with unsuccessfully submitting for a restraining order to cease the proceedings — has roiled her division and the group for practically a 12 months. A number of cities in her county have given her administration no-confidence votes, and the unions representing each her deputies and her sergeants have referred to as for her elimination.

A San Mateo County spokesperson mentioned the county had acquired the First Modification Coalition’s letter and would announce a choice quickly.

“The county has persistently expressed its view that this needs to be a completely clear course of, together with having the August enchantment listening to for her elimination from workplace be open,” mentioned San Mateo County spokesperson Effie Milionis Verducci. “Nonetheless, the sheriff has blocked it.”

The sheriff’s division continues to be in turmoil, most just lately when Corpus put a San Mateo County sheriff’s sergeant on depart. That sergeant had testified extensively in a second county investigation into Corpus. The union representing San Mateo County Sheriff’s sergeants objected, alleging the sergeant was placed on depart as retaliation for his testimony.

Corpus denied that her actions had something to do with the report in an announcement posted to the sheriff’s workplace web site.

“His non permanent administrative depart is solely unrelated to any feedback or cooperation he might have supplied within the Keker report,” Corpus mentioned within the assertion.