Bolt Graphics claims 13x leap over Nvidia RTX 5090 with less wattage

[ad_1] Add a LARGE GRAIN OF SALT: The GPU market is hotter than ever, fueled by gaming, AI, and information heart demand. However actual competitors to Nvidia stays scarce. That is the place Bolt Graphics is available in, pitching its new Zeus structure as a disruptor. The corporate claims it may beat Nvidia's flagship playing cards in uncooked efficiency, however a more in-depth look suggests Zeus could be extra smoke than silicon, probably repackaging server-class {hardware} in gamer-friendly clothes.

California-based startup Bolt Graphics just lately revealed detailed specs for its upcoming graphics playing cards, claiming they outperform the Nvidia RTX 5090 in path tracing workloads. Whereas the Zeus lineup seems spectacular on paper, a number of particulars elevate crimson flags.

The corporate first unveiled its formidable plans in March, boasting huge reminiscence swimming pools and graphics processors which can be, based on them, orders of magnitude sooner than Nvidia's.

A newly launched spec sheet takes these claims even additional – however Bolt's vertical TFLOP numbers seem suspiciously low, and the corporate choosing older VRAM codecs solid doubt on the gaming credentials of those GPUs.

The specs for the corporate's 4 deliberate GPUs: the Zeus 1c-032, 2c-064, 2c-128, and 4c-256, seem to outperform the RTX 5080, 4090, and even 5090 in a number of areas, all whereas consuming lower than half the facility.

As an example, the weakest entry-level "1c-032" is alleged to realize 77 gigarays in path tracing in comparison with the RTX 5090's 32. It additionally contains 128 MB of cache, and Bolt is making an attempt to revive socketable VRAM, enabling configurations with as much as 160 GB of reminiscence.

All of that is achieved with an influence draw of simply 120W, decrease than even the RTX 5050. In a refined jab at Nvidia, Bolt emphasised that Zeus makes use of normal 8-pin energy connectors, which it notes are "recognized to not soften."

Click on to enlarge

The upper-end Zeus fashions scale up the 1c's specs considerably, rising cache, VRAM, gigarays, and 8K video stream assist to ranges that appear nearly too good to be true.

The flagship 4c GPU, which makes use of barely much less energy than the RTX 5090, delivers 307 gigarays, options 512 MB of cache, and helps an astounding 2.3 TB of VRAM.

Deliver your concepts to life with Zeus, a brand new sort of GPU:- Expandable reminiscence: 32/64/128 GB soldered + 2x/4x SO-DIMM slots for as much as 384 GB reminiscence!- Huge enhancements to path tracing efficiency!- 400 GbE QSFP-DD port!- Constructed-in high-performance RISC-V CPU cores able to… pic.twitter.com/ITJyFInLGV

– Bolt Graphics (@BoltGraphicsInc) August 3, 2025

Nevertheless, all of those numbers stay theoretical. Bolt's "pre-silicon" efficiency estimates are based mostly on artificial benchmarks, not real-world gaming exams. Moreover, manufacturing is not anticipated to start till late 2026, which means the GPUs will not be out there earlier than 2027. By then, each AMD and Nvidia will probably have launched next-generation {hardware}.

If you happen to're questioning why any of this exists, the reply could be so simple as hype. Bolt might be making an attempt to show heads and switch that focus into funding, by using the present wave of GPU gold rush fever, particularly as AI accelerators proceed to be Silicon Valley's hottest {hardware} obsession.

The spec sheet additionally reveals areas the place the Zeus playing cards considerably path Nvidia's high-end RTX 5000 collection. These huge VRAM capacities depend on LPDDR5X and DDR5, that are probably a lot slower than AMD and Nvidia's GDDR6 and GDDR7 reminiscence.

Moreover, FP32 and FP16 TFLOP counts – essential for gaming efficiency – fall nicely beneath the RTX 5090, and in lots of circumstances, even beneath the RTX 5080.

If Bolt's numbers show correct, the Zeus collection might be compelling for sure HPC, rendering, or server workloads. However in relation to gaming (which additionally wants optimized drivers, and that takes lots of time – simply ask Intel), their real-world efficiency will probably stay unsure for no less than the following couple of years.